🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam ruling, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to use a revised congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

With a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

This decision comes amid a national fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create a number of more conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic leaders decried the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading House leader stated the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.