🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a new playlist called Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the standard Breakthrough setup but includes a few key adjustments:

• Each team has only 8 real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by real players award complete experience points, while AI activities provide reduced XP.
• Just a pair of locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking are disabled.

In short, this mode delivers on its title: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think it's a good idea, as it provides additional choices for players seeking alternative methods to enjoy the title. But, gaming history has shown one thing, it is that not everyone will be happy. In other words, many BF6 players are mad.

Player Responses: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are going with this game," while someone else details everything they believe to be broken in the game: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," says a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are players who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states another. A response via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," and someone else applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Concerns and Player Input

Despite the support, there are constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it will make wait times even longer for other modes due to the large amount of playlists in the game already. On a similar note, certain regions often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer full XP, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to remove bot farms from the system. Thus this new playlist feels like the community meeting them in the middle, according to forum feedback. Another labels this mode as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

Should the development team has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and acting on player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, if their data shows this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to change it again.