🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include lowering the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about industry interference with health policies. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the company recommends this be decreased to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary states the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.